What Would You Build With a Web of Data? - A BETTER WORLD

Georgi asked: What Would You Build With a Web of Data?. Richard McManus found the invitation worthy of a Read Write Web post and thus far it has become home for an interesting discussion.

I agree with several of the proposed ideas and I dislike others. But that's the beauty of this thing, that everyone will come at it from a different angle and, serendipitously along the way, we will run into pieces of each other's construction that fit our own vision. It's the nature of this giant human meshup we call "the web".

Here's my personal favorite app: A Better World.

Recently we had an 8.8 quake down here in Chile and several people died. Almost none if you compare this to Haiti or China. We had roughly 500 casualties. But nevertheless, we should have had zero. None. Zilch.

And this becomes evident when you analyze the causes of each death. Some of them are due to corruption and malpractice in the construction business. The vast majority of them were due to blunt negligence: a tsunami hit several localities after the quake but the alarm system didn't do its thing. In fact, the confused messaging that got across even encouraged some families to stay home while they could have easily walked "by foot", with no hurries, to a safe place.

There are people to be held accountable for all of this. Today, yesterday, 10 years ago, in the future and everywhere around the world. This anecdote is a symptom of a widespread and ancient social pandemic that is very hard to erradicate: negligence, corruption and lack of accountability.

A Web of Data would win in the long run. We should be able to go back and see why the Tsunami alert system was not in good shape and figure out where the missing satellite phones went ( if they were ever bought ).

In fact, the propsect of being implicitly accountable for anything would have enticed the responsible parties to do the job right in the first place. No one wants to go against his own interests. Not even the worse sociopaths. In fact, they would be the first ones to become "extremely good". So, while the deepest cause will remain, we would have effectively turned the tables on the problem.

( one name for this App could be: implicity accountability ).

We would also be able to rebuild the country faster and in a more agile manner if we had the "loose coupled coordination" that is naturally derived from a shared data substrate and a single world view. It is very hard to coordinate people in such a rush and, just like in the enterprise, information fragmentation has become enemy number 1.

And the blessing is that the enterprise understands this problem, and they are willing to pay and work to achieve this, again, in their own interest. Therefore, it is just a matter of time until my favorite app is in place.

Those that have heard my presentations know by heart what I always say: The only scarcity we have to overcome in order to fix the pending issues of our society is the Cost of Information Integration. All the other elements are present:

  • Most people already want to help
  • Those that don't will find an incentive once the attribution mechanisms are in place, courtesy of the Web of Data ( remember that identity & reputation are the new gold )
  • Goods can already be quickly moved across the world in a granular and efficient fashion given that you know the destination

So, my favorite app is definitely "A Better World".

As for the other ideas, they are all steps in this direction and will contribute their bit for my favorite app ;)

The global roadmap is unstoppable!

My Data is not (yet) Integrated!?

It is indeed a paradox that, being a data-integration freak by nature,
I haven't been able to beat my own data enthropy.
But frankly, I don't care.

What? But aren't you also the guy that bores us to death in endless
speeches about identity, self-branding and living on and for the web?

Indeed.

But here's the current scenario:
I have half of my life going on in Facebook these days. The rest is
scattered across Twitter, GMail, Blog comment threads, Skype chats,
Opensource projects, etc. And by the time I get hold of the latest
service I'm using, a new one comes along and catches my attention.
Now, should I be the one integrating these services? Should I be the
one taking care of walking in one straight line while the forces of
social media tear and new gadgets tear my identity apart?

Well, given that I am the one interested in reaping the benefits of
having a coherent brand across the web, it follows that it is in my
interest to do so. Right?

But why don't I do it then?

Because it would be a full time job to do so! Plus I am lazy and I
know what' coming next.
Someone else will do it for me. In fact, the web itself is slowly
"condensing" around identity. Just wait and see how the linked data
wave boosts this process.

In the meantime you can follow my fragmented self here and here and
here and here, etc ad infinitum in classic schizophrenic Web2.0 style

@aldonline
http://blog.aldobucchi.com/
http://posterous.aldobucchi.com/
http://facebook.com/aldo.bucchi
http://google.com/search?q=aldo+bucchi

If you're suffering from the same illness. Relax my friend, it will
soon pass. As long as you remember to abide to the golden rule of the
web: NEVER break or replace a URI. That's why I kept my old Blog URLs
intact and I ended up with blog.aldobucchi.com and
posterous.aldobucchi.com.

Let's just relax and wait for some Web3.0 magic :)